Now that the riots have died down and the French are sorting out causes and solutions, I would like to recap the coverage in the US media. The mainstream news networks were not generally too inflammatory, despite a bit of sensationalizing that is frankly typical of the ratings-conscious major news outlets. Reports focused on the burning of cars (which made for dramatic photo ops) and the reactions of Villepin, Sarkoszy, and a lack of visibility on the part of Chirac. The extreme right expressed their triumphant glee (naturellement), but we won't waste time on the predictably tedious spewings of the Fuckfrance.com knuckledraggers or their icons Limbaugh and O'Reilly. Many conservative newspapers couldn't resist muted displays of smug satisfaction and adaptations of the facts to suit their world view. Some emphasized that it was a Muslim (read: jihadist ) movement, for which they provided no credible supporting evidence. Some made observations to the effect that France got its just deserts for refusing to join the US in the War on Terror in Iraq. (It is amazing that serious journalists are still referring to the Invasion of Iraq as part of a War on Terror, given that the connection to 9/11 has been amply debunked. Even the Bush Administration has stopped using this term.) A journalist for the International Herald Tribune claimed that the HLM housing projects in the suburbs had been built expressly to segregate immigrant populations, which is patently untrue. They were built to ease a housing crisis and to accomodate French people with moderate means from all backgrounds. For more examples of conservative disinformation and Schadenfreude-infused quotations from conservative blogs and newspapers, read Patrick Gavin's blog post on the topic. Patrick closes his post with the reflection that In the end it was hard for me to figure out which was worse: What the riots said about France? Or what our reaction said about us.
What type of coverage would I have preferred to see? First, it would have been nice for media outlets to cover expressions of solidarity in France's moment of crisis, given our close economic and historical ties with that country. Not that I would have expected President Bush himself to declare "Now we are all French." during such domestic upheaval, mirroring what Chirac said on September 11th. But the media didn't seem to have much to cover in terms of American expressions of solidarity. There seemed to be a tacit underlying assumption that France had this coming. As far I as I was able to observe, any official expression of solidarity, concern or sympathy for our long-time ally was notably absent. The French have some social problems to solve and I am confident in their willingness and in their ability to do so. The right-wing and even moderate press coverage in the US generally reflected a pervasive intellectual laziness and certainly did not provide a serious critique of the societal challenges faced by France.
Recent Comments